American Values Alliance | Practical voice for progressive values"Is that real?"
I continued to order a pot of tea at my favorite coffee shop (they love me here) when I heard the question being asked again, mre emphatically this time. "Is your hair real or is it fake." Glancing about to see who the woman was talking to, I can't describe the embarassment I felt when I figured out that (1) she was talking, loudly, to me and that (2) the people gathered here at the shop were all waiting for an answer. So, like a good little llama in a petting zoo, I explained (with patience that surprised even me) that yes, my hair is real...no, I really do wash it...no, it doesn't take hours to do...(please, God, take me now) and no I don't unclip my hair at night, take it off and put it on a rack.
I'd never seen this white woman before in my entire life.
I'll say, at this point, that white people--you know I love you--but sometimes, you can irritate the piss out of somebody.
I think I'm a little sensitized these days, as many of you either can tell from my blogging or have felt for yourselves. Before coming here, I had another experience that left me wondering how much love I really do feel for my fellow melaninized cousins.
I don't want to talk about the "he said-she said" of it all--there's no integrity in that and, besides, it only serves to make others wrong. What I do want is to try to suss out what it is about that discussion that's left me so disturbed--so profoundly dissatisfied.
Are Our Leaders, Well, Leading?
I'm an on-again/off-again member of a race relations group in the city. Given the kinds of conversations that we've been in (or better yet, not been in) since Senator Obama's "Toward a More Perfect Union" speech, I thought it important that I check back in on this well-meaning group of civic, government, academic and business leaders and others like me--firmly in the peanut gallery.
What I found myself in was a very careful conversation--process-driven and cheerfully facilitated (by two wholly and entirely white therapists)--on the issue of race. No blow-by-blow can capture the sense of frustration and, I think, longing I felt on the part of those who were there wanting...something to happen. Some wanted the reins carefully fastened while others wanted the reins off and the lug nuts loosened. Choreographed to prevent some conversational injury (or career catastrophe), the process seemed to press the juice out of the berry before we'd determined just what the berry was.
The Meeting Where We Met on the Meeting
After the meeting, those gathered continued to yearn for that something. I wound up coming back into the meeting "after-set" to land in a conversation where I found me pushing my own buttons. I'd like to say that the smug brother I was talking to pushed them, but he doesn't have that kind of power. Talking about how Black people are at the effect of the white, male dominated power structure, I challenged him to consider that we aren't taking responsibility for the things we are responsible for and have power over--like our children.
He was ready for me, "what if they don't have a dad in the home"..."what if they don't go to church"..."what if the teachers don't care"..."what if..."
"Shut the fuck up!" I wanted to suggest, but he operates in a world I don't live in...and never will--one where black people can only ever hope to advance as a people at the whim and by dint of white largesse. One with no hope whatsoever. Maybe I'm too optimistic, but I'd never engage in a conversation of this type if I felt we were irrecovably doomed from the start.
We Blacks aren't as monolythic as one would think.
Dangerous Conversations
So, when I found myself, 30 minutes later, at my shop with this white chick asking if I bought my hair, I was more than a little peeved--that, sprinkled liberally with more forebearance than I knew I could muster...a holdover from my earlier conversation at the after-set.
"Deliver us, O God, O Truth, O Love, from quiet prayer..." So starts one of the best open meditations I've read in a long, long time. Thanks to Regina Sara Ryan for crafting it out of her essence...and for having the courage to share it with us. I needed it for a day like today:
Pray Dangerously
Deliver us, O God, O Truth, O Love, from quiet prayer from polite and politically correct language, from appropriate gesture and form and whatever else we think we must put forth to invoke or praise You.
Let us instead pray dangerously-wantonly, lustily, passionately.
Let us demand with every ounce of our strength, let us storm the gates of heaven, let us shake ourselves and our plaster saints from the sleep of years.
Let us pray dangerously.
Let us throw ourselves from the top of the tower, let us risk a descent to the darkest regions of the abyss, let us put our head into the lion's mouth and direct our feet to the entrance of the dragon's cave.
Let us pray dangerously.
Let us not hold back a little portion, dealing out our lives-our precious minutes and our energies-like some efficient accountant.
Let us rather pray dangerously-unsafe, profligate, wasteful!
Let us ask for nothing less that the Infinite ravage us.
Let us ask for nothing less than annihilation in the Fires of Love.
Let us not pray in holy half-measures nor walk the middle path for too long, but pray madly, foolishly.
Let us be too ecstatic, let us be too overwhelmed with sorrow and remorse, let us be undone and dismembered...and gladly.
Left to our devices, ah what structures of deceit we have created; what battlements erected, what labyrinths woven, what traps set for ourselves, and then fallen into.
Enough.
Let us pray dangerously-hot prayer, wet prayer, fierce prayer, fiery prayer, improper prayer, exuberant prayer, drunken and completely unrealistic prayer.
Let us say "Yes," again and again and again. and Yes some more.
Let us pray dangerously.
The most dangerous prayer is "yes."
Discussions of race, frankly, aren't for cowards of those with a weak sense of self and identity. I think they require a certain sense of abandon...a kind of "no holds barred" willingness to get messy and take a punch so you can get to the other side and find out what's there.
Clinical Collisions
For many whites, there has been an almost clinical discussion of "Black Anger" and an even more clinical dissection of discussions for any evidence of it "We need to make this a safe place.," though only one part of the discussion can afford to ever feel safe--anywhere.
What's been missing has been an equally detatched, clinical discussion of white unwillingness to engage--the kind of flattening of affect that would allow a people to stand idly by and watch as others were abused for centuries (it chills me even now to think about the narratives of slave masters wives) or demand that conversations with Blacks on race have safety nets with multiple redundancies like parachutes with a reserve chute in case the main chute failes.
Even the worst therapist knows that familial abuse can traverse generations with it growing and morphing into something almost incomprehensible that leaves some asking "why can't they just get over it?" Denial--of fact, of impact, of awareness, responsibility or denial of denial itself--is our National Disease. In a much earlier blog post, I commented on a slave era cartoon. It depicted a slave (Black) under the boot of a standing slave master (white). In the cartoon, the master was tossing off invectives at the slave: "You're nothing... just a thing under my shoe." The slave's response: Massa, with yo foot on my neck, ain't neither one of us going anywhere.
And here we are.
Social Salons
Years ago, before moving to Indy-inert-polis, I'd been having a series of "social salons" in my home where we ate and talked about race, religions and a host of other topics in my little house in Dayton, IN. Maybe there was something about the times or something about the house, but for a little less than three years, we gathered almost every Wednesday to talk and to get to know each other--really know each other. No process. Just food and a willingness to try to understand.
I'd like to try these again. Anyone else interested?
Lalita Amos's blog | login or register to post comments
Maybe you should consider filming a series of round table discussions about race relations, omitting the therapists and confining the moderator to keeping the discussions on track and somewhat polite. Each session could have a specific theme that the participants could run with. Then, after some post-production, maybe you could network copies around to interested groups. You might even qualify for grant money to pay for it all.
I'd be interested in attending, but as I work out of town all week, I fear I would rarely be able to attend.
Indianapolis should be a place where rational race relations has a permanent place at the table. Sadly, it's still separate, but equal (or worse) more often than not.
I agree that this has been a great discussion. I believe that few really are ready to deal with the truth. African-American leaders dare not tell the truth about the self-inflicted challenges that "we" face, and it is too easy for "white folks" to be pushed into the pit of racism by saying how they feel.
On the other hand, few "white folks" dare not tell the truth of the morays that carefully assign some in "our" community to second class citizens, and it is far too easy for "black folks" to find simple math as racism.
The problem is that the willingness to deal with the messy truth that is our social circumstance is wanting; and the tendency to correctly assess where we are as a society falls in the bucket called "all or nothing."
Have there been improvements in the way people relate in America? Yes! Are things still bad out there? Yes! Am I "Patriot or Pinhead" for acknowledging both realities . . . Better not ask O'Reilly. I submit that to be critical of the state, does not mean I am less a patriot; and to hold African-American leaders accountable for honestly and clearly speaking to issues facing "our community" without calling all white people racists does not make me less a nationalist. Loving white people does not make me an "Uncle Tom," nor does pulling the sheets off of institutional and systemic practices that negatively impact on the interests of "other people" simply because of the skin they are in, does not make me a fringe, race-baiting lunatic!
Why such a defensive tone? Maybe it is because I am constantly "under sniper cross fire" between Fear and Truth!
As you point out, parity allows us to only be as good or as bad as the Joneses. In an earlier post, I wrote about how half of Black teen girls may have an STD (according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Disease rates for white and Hispanic girls is much lower, twenty percent. On the matter of education, we found that only 30% of IPS children graduate from high school, with suburban graduation rate percentages in the 70's.
As Toby seems to be asking, are we as Black people really OK with ONLY 20% of our girls infected with STD's (some of which, like HPV, can lead to cancer) or with ONLY 30% of our children failing in school?
I didn't think we were.
Sorry to say this so baldly, but white achievement (or lack thereof) is not the metric by which I run my life. It shouldn't be and what a terrible burden on white people that is, anyway.
What Toby points to resonates for me in other areas as well. See, I used to be an Affirmative Action officer years ago, and I figured out, much to my dismay, that is was one of the most ineffective parity conversations of them all. If employers in the "reasonable recruitment area" did a poor job in hiring, we were off the hook--we didn't have to be any better than the Jonses. We just couldn't be any worse and as soon as we met our goal for placement...all action stopped. There just wasn't any more energy to be found to continue developing or implimenting recruitment and retention strategies.
We just stopped.
What I'd like to learn is what we're really committed to achieving--all of us--what we want for ourselves, our families, children, businesses, communities. I'd like to see people declare their clear intentions for these important domains of personal and community life and then work to achieve them.
I'd like to see us move ahead instead of being satisfied with a certain amount of "collateral damage."
________
Lalita L. Amos, CRC
http://www.totalteamsolutions.com
http://totalteam.blogspot.com
I wrote a very long comment and lost it when I tried to edit it . . . ultimately realizing that I was way too wordy and should have stopped listening to myself talk . . .
I was at the same meeting as Lalita this morning and found myself more than inspired to change the debate we often have about the disparity that can be found among "competing groups." And when the data comes out that Blacks vs. Whites is this and that, I will once again ask . . . "Would the Black community be satisfied if we died, dropped out, succesded or were incarcerated at the same rate as white people?"
When the data mongers fire the darts to discredit me, I will feel quite comfortable in my own skin knowing that the principles I "Live" are the "Answer" to the questions that will come out of the report . . . "What do we do about it!
Rep. Bill Crawford always says, "ignorance is a choice; I choose to be informed . . . " And I say, empowered people relate well . . . even if it is on a battlefield. Empowered people define and act upon their interets," and if we were honest, I doubt we will find the Black community deciding that the standard of excellence is embodied by white skin, and the condition of disadvanctage is inherent in black skin.
A leader in our community offered up as fundamental to our "honest discussion of race" the idea of white priviledge . . . As if white priviledge is the critical element that must first be addressed in mitigating black morbidity, incarceration and educational failure.
Ohhh Lalita . . . How does it feel to be a problem? I bet you respond like DuBois . . . Without saying a word!
I just hope that I have the same wisdom and restraint when the questions or disparity data come out!
This is one of the best posts I've read. (Not just because I seriously considered attending the meeting this morning, and concluded it was unlikely to be unscripted and/or meaningful.)
Originally, RRLN was supposed to be a venue for real conversation among people who would commit to engaging in such a conversation, but then it expanded and became unwieldy. Lots of reasons for that, most of them small-p political.
The time may well be right for a leaner, meaner, more honest set of discussions, in an environment free of "political correctness."
Count me in. (And I already KNEW your hair was real...)
Sheila Kennedy
6 hours 55 min ago
7 hours 14 min ago
21 hours 33 min ago
22 hours 20 min ago
1 day 12 hours ago
1 day 13 hours ago
1 day 16 hours ago
1 day 21 hours ago
1 day 21 hours ago
2 days 5 hours ago