John McCain, who voted against the King holiday in 1983 and in 1987 did little as he saw his state vote to recind their participation in the King holiday, is--right now--in Memphis, marking the 40th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. King. My irony meter is at 22.

This from the good people at "The Color of Change:"

On this date, 40 years ago, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated in Memphis. It's a day when many of us will celebrate his legacy, the values he espoused, and his vision for a better America. Some will talk about the King who challenged America's unlawful war in Vietnam, who found common ground with Malcolm X, and who became more aggressive in his push for improving America. But the media will likely focus a great deal on politicians who give speeches where they try to align themselves with his legacy.

We wanted to make sure that today when Senator McCain speaks, you and your friends and family know who's talking.

McCain will bring his "Service to America" tour to Memphis on Friday, but many people don't know the service he touts includes voting against the federal holiday honoring Dr. King. In August 1983 he fought the holiday, voting to block a piece of bipartisan legislation honoring him that was supported by even conservative Republicans--including Dick Cheney--and signed into law by President Reagan.
 
McCain went on to resist recognizing a King holiday in his home state of Arizona. When Arizona's state legislature failed to pass a bill recognizing a holiday honoring Dr. King, the governor at the time, Bruce Babbit, created the holiday by executive order. Babbit's successor, Gov. Evan Mecham rescinded the order as his first act in office, doing away with the holiday. John McCain's response? He defended the governor, not Dr. King. (After undoing the holiday, the same governor went on to publicly support referring to Black people as "pickaninnies").

In 1990, seven years after his initial vote, McCain went along with establishing a King holiday. On the campaign trail in 2000, facing questions about his history on this issue, McCain declared he had "evolved."
 
Looking at the rest of McCain's public record, even recently, it's hard to see much evidence of an "evolution". In fact, McCain has consistently opposed a civil rights agenda:

He voted an amazing FOUR times against the Civil Rights Act of 1990--a bill designed to make it easier for employees to prove job discrimination and imposing harsher penalties on bosses who discriminated.
In 2004 he opposed affirmative action in college admissions--a key component of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that is among King's key legislative victories.

He has voted at least 8 times against raising the minimum wage.

And as recently as last month, he argued against federal intervention to help Americans, disproportionately Black Americans, who have faced foreclosure during the housing crisis.

If John McCain has evolved, he hasn't evolved much. Instead, we see a consistent and troubling pattern. From campaigning against Dr. King's holiday to undermining important civil rights laws, John McCain has not stood side by side with King's vision, he has stood in its way.

Today, we hope that everyone will take a moment to pause and remember Dr. King's legacy, recognizing his contributions of words, deeds and ultimately his life. And we hope that all can see past political posturing (regardless of who it comes from) and embrace the bold, challenging vision that King actually projected. We believe that in doing so, we honor both his legacy and his sacrifice.

-- James, Van, Gabriel, Clarissa, Mervyn, Andre, and the rest of the ColorOfChange.org team
   April 4th, 2008

For more info on McCain's record, read this factsheet

About a million years ago when this primary season started, I was very pro-McCain. Very. However, what's continued to trouble me about Senator McCain and, by extension, the Republican Party is that there isn't room for me...and they don't care. I'm an odd mix of social moderate and fiscal mezzo-conservative--a Black woman who thinks that Affirmative Action is still necessary (and HR practitioners should be certified to get anywhere near the subject), we're to look to the Constitution to frame any discussion of civil rights (and not your Torah, Bible, Koran or dartboard) and that financial responsibility needs to be the watchword of government action (rather than the tax and spend tendencies I've been seeing, surprisingly, from members of the GOP as they prosecute this ruinous war). I think that when government policy creates barriers the government should be responsible, in part, for fixing it. However, I also think that we should be very careful not to create an government we can't pay for. 

Truly, as I watch this primary unfold, I see three good candidates struggle to get their message across while doing to two-step with the extremes of their respective bases.

I think Senator McCain can evolve and, like all of us, I think that's good. However, I also think that he can show a little more of the courage for which he distinguished himself in Vietnam here on the homefront.

Lalita Amos's blog | login or register to post comments