American Values Alliance | Practical voice for progressive valuesStop with the push for ethanol production, already. Over a year ago, reports indicated that only a small percentage of corn yields could go into ethanol without impacting prices in food markets. Certainly I wasn't the only one who heard those reports?!
Back in April, Robert Zoellick, head of the World Bank, issued a cautionary note about ethanol's impact on food prices:
Demand for ethanol and other biofuels is a "significant contributor" to soaring food prices around the world, World Bank President Robert Zoellick says. Droughts, financial market speculators and increased demand for food have also helped create "a perfect storm" that has boosted those prices, he says.
Before that, reports from reputable scientists began to express conflicting concerns that the benefits from ethanol use were outstripped, however slightly, by the cost of production.
August 6, 2001 -- "Neither increases in government subsidies to corn-based ethanol fuel nor hikes in the price of petroleum can overcome what one Cornell University agricultural scientist calls a fundamental input-yield problem: It takes more energy to make ethanol from grain than the combustion of ethanol produces."
Not that it costs less to produce , but it produces less energy.
While at the same time, agricultural economists reported that only a slight increase in diversion of corn into buifuel production could be tolerated before we began seeing impact on food costs as farmers vied to get their corn into more lucrative biofuel production. Now NPR, reports that we are in that "perfect storm" where exactly this scenario is playing itself out.
High Corn Prices Cast Shadow Over Ethanol Plants - A rush to cash in on ethanol has slowed as soaring corn prices squeeze profit margins for producers of the alternative fuel. At a recent high of $7 per bushel (Lalita: Last year, it was about two bucks and change), the corn used to make ethanol has tripled in price since many plants were built two years ago.
Hope Mr. Daniels is paying attention. On another note, I still am unsure about why we need to use fresh corn oil for biodiesel when the waste stream is being filled with waste oil from cooking (particularly from fast food restaurants).
Lalita Amos's blog | login or register to post comments
Norway seems to know a thing or two about energy production. Sure it's not utilized on a scale as large as we'd need it to here, but in conjunction with other methods it could do a lot to alleviate our dependance on foreign oil. I don't see why we can't look at their model and use it as the basis for somthing similar here.
except for the depiction of the Federal government demonstrating "masterful" skill. I think I would prefer "cunning" or "sly" instead.
Without fail the federal government has demonstrated a masterful skill at enacting legislation with little information and then once enacted the inertia takes over and it gets nearly impossible to reverse.
Yes corn ethanol was a bad idea from the start, but so were tobacco and peanur subsidies. Do we remember the blocks of cheese because the feds had susidized the dairy industry so much they had cheese coming out of their ears?!?!?
Pouring vast sums of money into wind and solar without a comprehensive energy policy is a terrible waste of money.
Spending on Yucca Mountain is now expected to exceed $90 BILLION to store spent nuclear fuel. France has recycled their nuclear fuel for over 30 years with no incidents.
Uranium has quadrupled in price since October and we are spending $90 BILLION, with a B, to bury it.
So many ill conceived notions that lobbyists and political self interest trumps knowledge and doing the right thing.
2 days 15 hours ago
3 days 20 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago